If the view angle is too finicky it'll be impossible calibrate accurately. Other than that, my only advice is to get the best display you can afford. If you're not sure you might consider Adobe's cloud option with monthly rental/lease fees. But if you work in layers or have other special editing needs, sure, Photoshop is a better choice. Even my low end Lenovo laptop with a 1.6GHz AMD APU and 4GB RAM runs Lightroom 4 & 5 well enough for 16mp raw files. Unless you really need Photoshop you might find that Lightroom does most of what you need. _ *A "Windows bigot" is the PC equivalent of the "Mac Mujahid". Given your criterion on screen size, maybe you should consider an external desktop monitor for home work. I would agree that the MacBook Pro, especially with a Retina screen, is a sweet machine, however, but not cheap.Ī laptop of any kind is not really ideal for Photoshop editing work, but if you get a large and high-resolution screen (not so cheap, however) it can substitute pretty well. If you already have a working version of Photoshop and other software, you won't have to buy new copies (for a Mac), if you stick with Windows. If you are going to run Windows, the whole point is to take advantage of the cheapness of the machines that can run it. Stick with what you are used to, and for heaven's sake do NOT buy a Mac to run Windows. His statements about "innovation" and "synchronization of desktop and mobile" are exactly backward of what most people (e.g., link) think about the two OSs, unless they are "Windows bigots"*.īut never mind. People who run Macs do so for the OS, not for the hardware. I think Eric~ doesn't know much about the state of the Mac OS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |